A Study on DEMATEL Approach Under Uncertainty Environments

Saraswathi Appasamy

doi:10.31181/sor31202628

Authors

Saraswathi Appasamy Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4777-2692

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202628

Keywords:

Fuzzy theory, Triangular fuzzy number, Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL, Decision making, MCDM

Abstract

A fuzzy set is a mathematical construct that assigns a membership grade to each element within a universe of discourse, representing the degree to which the element belongs to the set. This approach extends classical binary logic by allowing continuous values between 0 and 1, making it a natural framework for handling uncertainties and vague concepts often expressed in natural language. Fuzzy sets are particularly powerful in modelling real-world scenarios where ambiguity and imprecision are inherent, such as in human decision-making, linguistic expressions, and complex systems. This paper introduces a novel application of fuzzy logic by proposing a fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. DEMATEL is a well-established technique used to analyse cause-and-effect relationships within complex systems. Still, its traditional form relies on crisp values, which may not adequately capture the inherent uncertainties in real-world data. Our proposed method integrates triangular fuzzy numbers into the DEMATEL framework, enabling the representation and analysis of data with imprecision and vagueness. Specifically, we apply the fuzzy DEMATEL approach to study the cause-and-effect relationships among factors affecting transgender individuals, a population often marginalized and underrepresented in research. By leveraging triangular fuzzy numbers, our method provides a more nuanced and realistic representation of the uncertainties and complexities in the data. This approach not only enhances the accuracy of the analysis but also offers a meaningful way to interpret vague or subjective information, ultimately contributing to more informed decision-making and policy development for transgender communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005

Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems and invitation to further thoughts within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre.

Yang, J. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert systems with applications, 38(3), 1417-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048

Lin, K. P., Tseng, M. L., & Pai, P. F. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.017

Hosseini, M.B., & Tarokh, M.J. (2011). Interval of type-2 fuzzy set extension of DEMATEL method. Computational Intelligence and Information Technology, 250, 157–165.

Abbasi, M., Hosnavi, R., & Tabrizi, B. (2013). An application of fuzzy DEMATEL in risks evaluation of knowledge-based networks. Journal of Optimization, 1–7.

Devadoss, A. V., & Felix, A. (2013). A Fuzzy DEMATEL approach to study cause and effect relationship of youth violence. International Journal of Computing Algorithm, 2, 363-372.

Chen-Yi, H., Chen, K., & Gwo-Hshiung, T. (2007). FMCDM with Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach for Customers' Choice Behavior Model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9(4), 236-246.

Gharakhani, D., Taromian, S., Dadras, K., & Fakhar, A. Z. (2014, October 17–18). Fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL methods for supplier selection criteria. International Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (ICSIS’2014), Dubai, UAE.

Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2011). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0266-x

Vidhya, K., & Saraswathi, A. (2021). An improved A* search algorithm for the shortest path under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Granular Computing, 8(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00326-1

Broumi, S. (2024). An efficient approach for solving time-dependent shortest path problem under Fermatean neutrosophic environment. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 63(1), 1–6.

Prakash, Y., & Appasamy, S. (2023). Optimal solution for fully spherical fuzzy linear programming problem. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 10(5), 1611–1618.

Saraswathi, A. (2019). A fuzzy-trapezoidal DEMATEL approach method for solving decision-making problems under uncertainty. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2112(1), 020076-1–12.

Dharmaraj, B., & Appasamy, S. (2023). Application of a modified Gauss elimination technique for separable fuzzy nonlinear programming problems. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 10(4), 1481–1486.

Vidhya, K., & Saraswathi, A. (2023). A novel method for finding the shortest path with two objectives under trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy arc costs. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 21, 121–121.

Saraswathi, A. (2024). A study on triangular fuzzy clustering model under uncertainty. Uncertainty Discourse and Applications, 1(1), 20–28.

Yuvashri, P., & Saraswathi, A. (2024). A novel approach for multi-objective linear programming model under spherical fuzzy environment and its application. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 46(2), 3259–3280.

Karthick, S., Saraswathi, A., & Baranidharan, B. (2024). Neutrosophic linear fractional programming problem using denominator objective restriction method. Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications and Algorithms, 31(2), 89–101.

Saraswathi, A., & Nedumaran, P. (2024). Comparative study to find the critical path using triangular fuzzy number. Journal of computational analysis and applications, 33(5), 345-354.

Narang, M., Kumar, A., & Dhawan, R. (2023). A fuzzy extension of MEREC method using parabolic measure and its applications. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10020042023n

Nezhad, M. Z., Nazarian-Jashnabadi , J., Rezazadeh, J., Mehraeen, M., & Bagheri, R. (2023). Assessing Dimensions Influencing IoT Implementation Readiness in Industries: A Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy AHP Analysis. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 102-123. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda11202312

Kolour, H. R., Momayezi, V., & Momayezi, F. (2025). Enhancing Supplier Selection in Public Manufacturing: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap31202629

Dwijendra, N. K. A., Akhmadeev, R., Tumanov, D., Kosov, M., Shoar, S., & Banaitis, A. (2021). Modeling social impacts of high-rise residential buildings during the post-occupancy phase using DEMATEL method: A case study. Buildings, 11(11), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110504

Hsu, C.-Y., Chen, K.-T., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). FMCDM with fuzzy DEMATEL approach for customer's choice behavior model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9, 236–246.

Devadoss, V., & Felix, A. (2013). A fuzzy DEMATEL approach to study cause and effect relationship of youth violence. International Journal of Computing Algorithm Integrated Intelligent Research, 2, 363–372.

Seker, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustainability, 9(11), 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112083